Search found 3 matches
- Fri May 05, 2023 7:40 am
- Forum: Psychometric Function Fitting, Maximum-Likelihood Criterion (PAL_PFML, PAL_PFLR)
- Topic: Scaling for Stim Levels
- Replies: 4
- Views: 154446
Re: Scaling for Stim Levels
Thanks for the very detailed response. I will try this out.
- Mon May 01, 2023 10:22 am
- Forum: Psychometric Function Fitting, Maximum-Likelihood Criterion (PAL_PFML, PAL_PFLR)
- Topic: Scaling for Stim Levels
- Replies: 4
- Views: 154446
Re: Scaling for Stim Levels
Hi. Thanks for the quick response. I used the code PAL_PFML_Demo.
Here is my data.
0 1 5 24 30 30 30
1 6 13 19 24 22 27
3 7 6 17 14 23 26
1 0 6 12 18 23 23
3 8 9 18 23 24 29
5 7 12 17 20 23 21
0 2 5 13 13 23 22
0 8 8 13 17 18 24
0 3 11 22 28 27 30
11 6 18 23 20 28 27
1 3 6 17 25 27 28
0 0 4 13 21 ...
Here is my data.
0 1 5 24 30 30 30
1 6 13 19 24 22 27
3 7 6 17 14 23 26
1 0 6 12 18 23 23
3 8 9 18 23 24 29
5 7 12 17 20 23 21
0 2 5 13 13 23 22
0 8 8 13 17 18 24
0 3 11 22 28 27 30
11 6 18 23 20 28 27
1 3 6 17 25 27 28
0 0 4 13 21 ...
- Sat Apr 29, 2023 6:51 pm
- Forum: Psychometric Function Fitting, Maximum-Likelihood Criterion (PAL_PFML, PAL_PFLR)
- Topic: Scaling for Stim Levels
- Replies: 4
- Views: 154446
Scaling for Stim Levels
Hi. I am new to Palamedes. I was trying to fit my data using the PAL_PFML function. However, I am facing a problem with the scaling of stimulus levels. If I have to put my actual stimulus level, which is in the range of 300-700, it shows the error that the fit to simulation did not converge. Can ...